Love & Books: Could You Love A Non-Reader?

22nd July, 2009 6 Comments

After our brief little side-trip to the moon, we’re back with more to share about love and books.  I’ve divided the results of the survey into a few categories and today will be focusing specifically on whether or not your significant other or someone you have just started dating needs to be a reader.

Now, a caveat to start.  This survey was by no means accurate.  I asked a few questions of people who are here because they are readers; limited target group means limited responses.  So naturally, with similarly minded people all answering the survey, all the results are fairly similar.  But this gives us a good picture of the avid reader and what they expect/want out of a relationship as far as books are concerned.

For the most part, every participant said that yes, they required the other half of their relationship to be a reader.  Now, this did not mean that a first date was doomed because one party was not a reader.  Rik let us know that while he would date someone who is not a regular reader, he does feel that a date stating that she does not read at all to be sad and considers it a non-attractive statement.  Another participant said that reading was not a requirement for a first or even multiple dates but that these rarely make it further than casual dating.

Marge ended her survey by saying that she considers reading to be a hobby, much like an interest in sports or civil war reenactments,

It is an individual preference.  You do not need your other half to enjoy what you read, read when you read, or even read at all.  While it might be nice to share a book and then discuss it, I can’t see a relationship being based on that or surviving for that…if the other half is not interested, does that make the relationship doomed?  I should hope not!!

And she makes a valid point.  We love the people in our life because of the things that make them unique and interesting.  We may not have received many responses from couples where one party read and the other didn’t, but I think it’s safe to assume they are out there.  So why is an interest in reading often a deal breaker?  Why do mixed-relationships often fizzle?  Well, most of the participants had a similar response:  it’s not so much the reading that makes a difference, but what that reading says about you.  Both the singles and those in relationships claim that looking at someone’s bookshelves gives  you a broader picture of the person–sort of like a Google search, but less creepy.  Kurt, who is getting married in a few months, said that you get an overview of the other person’s “personal, cultural, and political perspective.”  We tend to look at people’s bookshelves to get an idea of who they are, even if that person is a friend or stranger rather than a potential partner.

With singles, a different taste in books is similar to a different taste in music.  Jesse tells us,

I imagine it would be awesome to find a lady who has, say, three shelves of architecture books.  Books are such great conversation pieces and they provide such sharp insight into someone’s personality.

A shared interest in reading is a natural conversation starter and discussion about different tastes in books can lead us into different avenues of conversation.  For example, someone who collects books on castles can spark a discussion on both parties’ experiences traveling through Europe.

Meanwhile, Margie (yes, we had two) let us know that two past relationships were with people who “rarely, if ever read.”  She doesn’t consider reading preferences to be a deal-breaker, whether they be choosing not to read at all or their choice in reading material (“unless it was something very warped and they were so compulsive about the reading material that they let it affect their behavior”).  However, she does point out that in the past when a book has made an impact on her, she’s not had anyone to share or discuss the book with.

I think in the future, I might consider somebody’s lack of reading as an important part of the package.  I want to talk about something intelligent, and to do that one must read.

While the books someone reads lets us understand them a little more, most of the married or long-term relationship respondents said that there while there was some overlap in reading preferences; for the most part each party had vastly different tastes.  This broadened their own scope and impression of the world.  Avid readers, it seems, have a natural curiosity about the world and enjoy learning about new things.  While they might prefer biographies over science fiction, they were able to appreciate the differences that made their partner unique and had, on occasion, tried a book upon the recommendation of their partner.  Occasionally this leads to discussion and an entirely new genre of books to choose from.

Ultimately, the key to a strong relationship is respect between both partners.  As much as the avid reader may want to date another reader, we can’t always predict who we fall in love with.  Sometimes that other person does not read much, if at all.  This is where respect comes into play.  One reader, Linda, let us know that in past relationships she was made to feel guilty about the time she spent reading and not paying attention to the other person.  The guilting from her partners was not respectful to her interests.  Linda is now married.  ”My husband respects my choice to read and tries not to interrupt me while I’m reading.”  Referring back to Marge, reading is a hobby and we need to respect our partner’s choices to spend time  on their hobbies, whether they be reading, building a tiny ship in a bottle, or learning circus hula-hooping, and in turn we require them to respect our choices.

Welcome to Stacked! If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to the StackedBlog RSS feed. Thanks for visiting and come back soon!

Related posts:

  1. Love & Books Redux – Part 1 After the Love & Books series was completed, I occasionally...
  2. Love & Books Redux: Part 2 As I re-read all the original Love & Books posts, a...
  3. Love & Books: Love in the Stacks It’s personal details time on Stacked!  You know, where I...
  4. Love & Books: My Advice To You When it comes to relationships, advice books seem to be...
  5. Love & Books Redux: Part 3 I still don’t understand, and don’t believe I ever will,...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Tags: , , ,

Posted on: July 22, 2009 by Christina

Filed under: Contemplation

6 Comments

Samantha Schoech

July 22nd, 2009 at 3:47 pm    


I married a bookstore owner so my answer is obvious (although we almost never read and discuss the same books). My best friend reads more than anyone I know and her husband has NEVER READ A BOOK. For me this would be a deal breaker, about as attractive as someone saying they’ve never brushed their teeth. But, ten years later and they are still happy (or at least happy enough).
PS. My bookstore hubby sent me you blog. Glad he did.
.-= Samantha Schoech´s last blog ..Manish chickens and our own fertilizer factory =-.

Marcelo

July 22nd, 2009 at 4:32 pm    


I like that idea that it’s more what reading says about you than whether you’re reading. Not reading may not be a dealbreaker, but a demonstrated lack of intellectual curiosity is. There are other ways to show than than by reading.

Christina

July 22nd, 2009 at 4:42 pm    


Smart move Samantha! Bookstore owner is definitely the way to go, glad you found your way here!

Christina

July 22nd, 2009 at 4:44 pm    


And Marcelo – I had ment to include some of your previous comments from the original survey post. What you had to say there really went along with this concept:

“For me it was never about someone who reads or doesn’t read as much as finding someone who was interested in something, a learner who isn’t above finding new things and trying new ideas out for size.”

For someone like us – the readers – we need someone of similar intellectual curiousity. That comes in many forms, reading being one of them.

bibliogrrl

July 22nd, 2009 at 6:02 pm    


Well, I’ve been on both sides. I married (and divorced) a former co-worker from a past bookstore job. He said I read too much.

I later dated someone who “didn’t read books”. He turned out to be rude, watched far too much TV… I learned other very cool things from him. But he taught me that books are a dealbreaker.

I’ll never date a non-reader again.
.-= bibliogrrl´s last blog .. =-.

Ari

July 22nd, 2009 at 11:06 pm    


That’s a really interesting read, you came up with some really interesting results.

I don’t know that I’ve ever read the same book as a boyfriend before, although I think that would be cool.
.-= Ari´s last blog ..Just blah.. on disappointment and pain =-.

Leave a reply